Re: [manet] Discussing LOADng suggestions

Antonin Bas <antonin.bas@polytechnique.edu> Tue, 31 July 2012 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <antonin.bas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEBC21F884B for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JDX+OoDkE5ol for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294D321F8842 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcac10 with SMTP id c10so4264806qca.31 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uE3feNkE/XoKVEu3cSvFnesXThYktBvVCw5UmTzcVgk=; b=Cv6Nl7LbrI0hY4Dc4At97W06miE1nH++UrHPHSOCtdmXwkv0wpLv2x/E4WLAhj4Jgb bPeqWx3r4L7lE7JUmTu7zp4ugg4p/WpMQaHNfIDC8wOsqIBSiy/QJIk7fCK3gA+5f1xd KaKLZ4fkYABkz+Akq9XquHXHgk4A42s3jfht1LZWfN82pnn3BZCcjYEQRd7qwrQj9Kdc 6xiLOfuH2oe9GEAYTM12+tzTXCHsUEDRk3MtryULV+8/OGUGnlUvXGSp+k7qJB5CwiZB 28bHR3HcQw6kym24xdwmIXsz20Go2oD/BtSQKM4PW1c/ISF9q3jonRX851BsKLFhMCkh 8gNA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.187.6 with SMTP id cu6mr31177741qab.63.1343756656610; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: antonin.bas@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.137.35 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC9p3Af+zvzsiL-m1H0SfNUfQFuFL09mka+40+oWciTVpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGnRvurn9b5Kdfm16LT6GLXhfH4dQ1azwqKvaTih5zXvHFsc2w@mail.gmail.com> <1339916196.339062.1343755922162.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <CAK=bVC9p3Af+zvzsiL-m1H0SfNUfQFuFL09mka+40+oWciTVpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:44:16 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DmiTmd-3Z_8pK_4hFfdSRLzhZuA
Message-ID: <CAAkB0aCDUKt92oU0gDL0fF7Tdz7Ee4sSwuuYyGF_Fi6yV-Ou5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Antonin Bas <antonin.bas@polytechnique.edu>
To: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: manet <manet@ietf.org>, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [manet] Discussing LOADng suggestions
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:45:57 -0000

According to MANET charter,

The purpose of the MANET working group is to standardize IP routing
  protocol functionality suitable for wireless routing application within
  both static and dynamic topologies with increased dynamics due to node
  motion or other factors.

So I don't think MANETs are defined by mobility, but by "increased
dynamics",which can be due to motion, but also to lossy links.

2012/7/31 Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>:
> MANETs are not defined by mobility. It is rather about very dynamic
> topologies. Otherwise, community networks such as FunkFeuer would also not
> be qualified as MANETs.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> wrote:
>>
>> The wireless network of "fixed" temperature monitoring sensors and HVAC
>> controllers in a building. This network is an LLN. Not sure if it qualifies
>> as a MANET (since nothing is mobile).
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mukul
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Henning Rogge" <hrogge@googlemail.com>
>> To: "Abdussalam Baryun" <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "manet" <manet@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:49:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: [manet] Discussing LOADng suggestions
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
>> <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > IMHO this protocol was intended as for ROLL WG not for MANET WG, but
>> > then changed its direction to MANET [3]. However, please note that
>> > *ONLY* some LLNs are MANETs, and *ONLY* some MANETs are LLNs. That
>> > said, LOADng SHOULD specfy where is its limits. Then we can discuss
>> > adoption.
>>
>> Could you state an example what would be considered a LLN but not a
>> MANET. I normally consider LLNs a subset of what we call MANETs.
>>
>> Henning Rogge
>>
>> --
>> Steven Hawkings about cosmic inflation: "An increase of billions of
>> billions of percent in a tiny fraction of a second. Of course, that
>> was before the present government."
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>